Publishing was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Writing, a WikiProject interested in improving Wikipedia's coverage of content related to the fields of rhetoric, composition, technical communication, literacy, and language studies.WritingWikipedia:WikiProject WritingTemplate:WikiProject WritingWriting
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
Publishing is part of WikiProject Open Access, a collaborative attempt at improving the coverage of topics related to Open Access and at improving other articles with the help of materials from Open Access sources. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Open AccessWikipedia:WikiProject Open/Open access task forceTemplate:WikiProject Open AccessOpen access
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Open, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OpenWikipedia:WikiProject OpenTemplate:WikiProject OpenOpen
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia
Should we not include names like HarperCollins, Hachette Livre, Macmillan Publishers, Simon & Schuster, Scholastic, Wiley, and Springer Nature in the list? Kolkata.gurgaon (talk) 13:56, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia isn't meant to be a directory of companies, lists should be kept to necessary examples rather than trying to be exhaustive. MrOllie (talk) 14:00, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I understand the concern about keeping lists concise and avoiding directory-style content. However, these publishers are among the most influential in the industry, and mentioning a few key names could provide useful context for readers. If an exhaustive list isn't suitable, perhaps a brief mention of 'major international publishers such as HarperCollins and Hachette Livre' could strike a good balance. I’d love to hear other thoughts on this! Kolkata.gurgaon (talk) 06:28, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
level-3 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
